From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Propose Beta3 for July |
Date: | 2010-06-28 19:51:55 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimdTpNOexbwIEOZ7yNF1CujXGRAfaUNGnrD3oPM@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Well, do you consider 7/8 to be mid-July or "close to the beginning"?
>
>> 7/8 would be about the last date I'd consider reasonable, given a CF
>> starting 7/15. I would prefer a few days earlier, but I'm not sure
>> how much of a vote I get considering that I'm not actively involved in
>> the release process or the packaging of installers.
>
> It would be better not to branch until we're certain we won't need to
> re-wrap the beta. I'm wondering why you see a need for any daylight at
> all between the branch date and the start of the CF.
Well, I guess it isn't technically necessary, but I think it might
make things less hectic. Last year we had two weeks, which was more
than we needed, but I think a little slack time will make things go
more smoothly.
BTW, if we're going to do a second pgindent run for this release, we
probably want to do that before the branch point. Not sure if it
should be done before or after beta3.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-28 19:59:05 | Re: Propose Beta3 for July |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-28 19:44:41 | Re: Propose Beta3 for July |