Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-07-02 21:08:46
Message-ID: AANLkTim_tAoFeFPa6QFyOSezS4W9ZAfugtCCCvDUFqtR@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Okay, I'm confused.  This patch removed an operator named %, which AFAIK
>>> was not controversial.  The problematic operator is => no?
>
>> It used to be =>
>
> Nevermind, I *am* confused.  Obviously time to knock off for the day;
> my brain's fried.

Just as long as you don't ask to have it changed again.  :-)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-07-02 21:10:58
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-02 21:03:19
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group