On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Okay, I'm confused. This patch removed an operator named %, which AFAIK
>>> was not controversial. The problematic operator is => no?
>> It used to be =>
> Nevermind, I *am* confused. Obviously time to knock off for the day;
> my brain's fried.
Just as long as you don't ask to have it changed again. :-)
The Enterprise Postgres Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-07-02 21:10:58|
|Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-07-02 21:03:19|
|Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |