From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |
Date: | 2010-07-02 21:08:46 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTim_tAoFeFPa6QFyOSezS4W9ZAfugtCCCvDUFqtR@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Okay, I'm confused. This patch removed an operator named %, which AFAIK
>>> was not controversial. The problematic operator is => no?
>
>> It used to be =>
>
> Nevermind, I *am* confused. Obviously time to knock off for the day;
> my brain's fried.
Just as long as you don't ask to have it changed again. :-)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-02 21:10:58 | Re: No hash join across partitioned tables? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-07-02 21:03:19 | Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => |