Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Okay, I'm confused. This patch removed an operator named %, which AFAIK
>> was not controversial. The problematic operator is => no?
> It used to be =>
Nevermind, I *am* confused. Obviously time to knock off for the day;
my brain's fried.
regards, tom lane