From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Vacuum full warning |
Date: | 2011-01-21 13:46:17 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimZhLX=FVHdZbVbAOFeJ97kZEpeqTboCkxmALMN@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:30, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 13:22, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> I came across yet another case of "i did vacuum full because it seemed
>>>> like a good idea" today.. Urgh.
>>>>
>>>> What do you guys think of a patch like the attached, which throws a
>>>> warning when you run vacuum full from the maintenance dialog on a
>>>> pre-9.0 version?
>>>
>>> Something like that should be a guru hint shouldn't it?
>>
>> Hmm. That might be an idea. I always turn those off because the
>> majority of them are just annoying ;)
>>
>> Where the heck is the *source* for the guru hints stored?
>
> docs/xxxx/hints.
Meh. So why didn't mym "git grep" find that.. *annoyance*.
Anyway. Something like this, then? Am I missing something still?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
vacuum_full.patch | text/x-patch | 2.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-01-21 14:01:44 | Re: Vacuum full warning |
Previous Message | pgAdmin Trac | 2011-01-21 13:19:37 | [pgAdmin III] #299: Crash on table refresh |