Re: git: uh-oh

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 22:16, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I just looked at your latest conversion (based on what Max did) and it
>> looks a lot better.  I think, though, that we should re-remove these
>> branches:
>
>>   origin/unlabeled-1.44.2
>>   origin/unlabeled-1.51.2
>>   origin/unlabeled-1.59.2
>>   origin/unlabeled-1.87.2
>>   origin/unlabeled-1.90.2
>
> I haven't looked at Magnus' latest iteration, but in Max's version
> this was showing as a branch:
>
>  remotes/origin/REL8_0_0
>
> AFAIK that was simply a mistake: it was intended to be a tag not a
> branch.  If it's feasible to downgrade it to a tag during the
> conversion, that would be a good thing to do.

Shold be doable with a simple:
git tag REL8_0_0 REL8_0_0
git branch -D REL8_0_0

I'll try that and re-run my content-verification script on top of that.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/