| From: | Alastair Turner <bell(at)ctrlf5(dot)co(dot)za> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: First patch proposal |
| Date: | 2010-10-14 14:53:53 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimWzHv5f_f+f20k=2hP9UG2kX65hC=kETEaNc6y@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpt from Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> - Thu, Oct 14, 2010
at 4:32 PM:
> Just for information, did you pick this topic from TODO
> list? If so, could you attach links to the entry or to some related
> former thread? And in general it is encouraged that you'd better send
> one feature per a patch, in order for it to be reviewed and committed
> easily, rather than going all the three you mentioned above.
>
It isn't a TODO item, or related to any previous thread I could find.
When I'm making the changes I'll bear in mind the preference for
multiple small patches. I have a feeling that the changes would be to
the logic structure and that it wouldn't be possible to separate the
implementation of each check though.
Regards
Bell.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Newall | 2010-10-14 14:54:04 | Re: rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-10-14 14:49:19 | Re: SQL command to edit postgresql.conf, with comments |