From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.1 release notes |
Date: | 2011-03-24 21:38:29 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimVMkkHWqbGBp6jhj9J_wPCLjvhWBaYbmgTERL6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > I have completed and committed my draft of the 9.1 release notes. ?They
>> > will be continually updated and improved as we reach final release.
>> >
>> > What information should we take from the alpha release notes, and do we
>> > feel the alpha release notes are close enough to the ones I drafted that
>> > we can try avoiding my full release note generation in the future?
>>
>> I took a crack at moving the useful details from the alpha release
>> notes into the regular ones, which I do believe are better overall
>> than the alpha ones. Feel free to adjust as needed. At this point, I
>> think we should nuke the alpha release notes; I don't see any value in
>> having two versions around.
>
> Agreed.
Should we temporarily move the general disclaimers about alpha
releases into the main release notes, since I think we're going to
wrap alpha5 on Monday?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-25 04:53:54 | Re: 9.1 release notes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-24 21:27:12 | Re: 9.1 release notes |