Re: 9.1 release notes

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>> > I have completed and committed my draft of the 9.1 release notes. ?They
>>> > will be continually updated and improved as we reach final release.
>>> >
>>> > What information should we take from the alpha release notes, and do we
>>> > feel the alpha release notes are close enough to the ones I drafted that
>>> > we can try avoiding my full release note generation in the future?
>>>
>>> I took a crack at moving the useful details from the alpha release
>>> notes into the regular ones, which I do believe are better overall
>>> than the alpha ones.  Feel free to adjust as needed.  At this point, I
>>> think we should nuke the alpha release notes; I don't see any value in
>>> having two versions around.
>>
>> Agreed.
>
> Should we temporarily move the general disclaimers about alpha
> releases into the main release notes, since I think we're going to
> wrap alpha5 on Monday?

Bruce thought this approach made sense, so done.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company