| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Admission Control |
| Date: | 2010-07-09 04:20:59 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimM2FpQpS1CwWb07vftNv9TR-5eId8DvozzCUee@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Mark Kirkwood
<mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:
> On 09/07/10 15:57, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> Hmm. Well, those numbers seem awfully high, for what you're doing,
>> then. An admission control mechanism that's just letting everything
>> in shouldn't knock 5% off performance (let alone 30%).
>
> Yeah it does, on the other hand both Josh and I were trying to elicit the
> worst case overhead.
Even so...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-07-09 04:26:12 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-09 04:20:17 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel. |