| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sync Rep v17 |
| Date: | 2011-02-22 03:51:00 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTim1+yf95wwN50MVa_tZ8KEBMtMb5tvTmP+4xLa4@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm taking a look at replication timeout with non-blocking which would
> be "nice" but not required for this patch, in my understanding.
Why do you think so? You think sync_replication_timeout_client is sufficient
for sync rep?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-02-22 05:38:06 | Re: Sync Rep v17 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-22 03:45:01 | Re: validating foreign tables |