Re: Random Page Cost and Planner

From: David Jarvis <thangalin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Random Page Cost and Planner
Date: 2010-05-25 06:41:29
Message-ID: AANLkTil7Hq5RIqAHVwXbpKkfdtZSKg_UsQeNgJuTGMdI@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

I changed the date comparison to be based on year alone:

extract(YEAR FROM sc.taken_start) >= 1900 AND
extract(YEAR FROM sc.taken_end) <= 2009 AND

The indexes are now always used; if someone wants to explain why using the
numbers works (a constant) but using a date (another constant?) does not
work, I'd really appreciate it.

Thanks again, everybody, for your time and help.

Dave

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joachim Worringen 2010-05-25 07:59:56 performance of temporary vs. regular tables
Previous Message Łukasz Dejneka 2010-05-25 06:37:11 Re: Certain query eating up all free memory (out of memory error)