Re: Redundant database objects.

From: Andrew Bartley <ambartley(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Redundant database objects.
Date: 2010-07-13 06:07:21
Message-ID: AANLkTil5ynxcmIu78obTRO4Hmnek0C7GIG4tppJ4HlSb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks Alexander,

Wish i had thought of that.

I still need some way of finding redundant functions

Thanks again

Andrew

On 13 July 2010 15:38, Alexander Pyhalov <alp(at)rsu(dot)ru> wrote:

> Hello.
> When we moved old projects from postgresql 7.x to 8.4, I just looked at
> modification time for files in base/<dboid>/<toid> . So, I could determine,
> that some databases were inactive (precisely,not updated) for about a year
> and move them to archive...
>
> Andrew Bartley wrote:
>
> Is there an effective way to identify these objects using the stats
>> tables? Something like a last accessed/used or some such column?
>> Any suggestions welcomed.
>> Thanks
>>
>> Andrew Bartley
>> Aimstats Pty Ltd
>>
>>
>
> --
> С уважением,
> Александр Пыхалов,
> системный администратор ЮГИНФО ЮФУ.
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andras Fabian 2010-07-13 06:31:18 Re: PG_DUMP very slow because of STDOUT ??
Previous Message tamanna madaan 2010-07-13 05:54:37 Re: "attempted to lock invisible tuple" error while update