| From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch: to_string, to_array functions |
| Date: | 2010-07-21 04:39:33 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTil35lKM8nzjCO3jSnhjp3QwK1Nl7Bkunua_7WiF@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/7/20 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> here is a new version - new these functions are not a strict and
> function to_string is marked as stable.
We have array_to_string(anyarray, text) and string_to_array(text, text),
and you'll introduce to_string(anyarray, text, text) and
to_array(text, text, text).
Do we think it is good idea to have different names for them? IMHO, we'd
better use 3 arguments version of array_to_string() instead of the
new to_string() ?
If to_string and to_array is in the SQL standard, we can accept the
name changes.
But if there are no standard, I'd like to keep the existing function names.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-07-21 04:58:49 | Re: leaky views, yet again |
| Previous Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-07-21 03:27:00 | Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions |