| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi, depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Subject: | Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered |
| Date: | 2011-01-21 02:49:18 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikuy5eYqNqcOQ1pCidDH6xtUTbzTLdo7fCqBGvD@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Mark Kirkwood
<mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:
> On 21/01/11 15:24, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Kevin Grittner
>> <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> Right -- God only knows the number of things were filtered out to
>>> leave me with filtered water. What's "filtered" in this case is what
>>> was passed through, not what was removed.
>>
>> Hmm, I guess I see your point now. Well, I'm not wedded to the name,
>> but I don't like removed any better.
>>
>> Rows eliminated?
>>
>
> Rows filtered *out* ?
Seems like Tom just had the same thought. Works for me. I'm still
not thrilled with the proposed formatting, but I can probably live
with it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-21 02:52:46 | Re: Is there a way to build PostgreSQL client libraries with MinGW |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-21 02:48:12 | Re: ALTER TABLE ... REPLACE WITH |