Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Spread checkpoint sync

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spread checkpoint sync
Date: 2011-01-29 13:13:04
Message-ID: AANLkTikscc25CJsV=yue2QoibX0S4MsSWun5ETFNYLER@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Where there are still very ugly maximum latency figures here in every case,
> these periods just aren't as wide with the patch in place.

OK, committed the patch, with some additional commenting, and after
fixing the compiler warning Chris Browne noticed.

> P.S. Yes, I know I have other review work to do as well.  Starting on the
> rest of that tomorrow.

*cracks whip*

Man, this thing doesn't work at all.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter RosinDate: 2011-01-29 13:26:24
Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] mingw64
Previous:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2011-01-29 13:09:33
Subject: Re: REVIEW: WIP: plpgsql - foreach in

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group