From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL on Solaris future |
Date: | 2010-08-01 17:25:38 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTiki2sEhggBc4Aps-uHbHQ++uhn=kOC4TKfOp=4J@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net> wrote:
> I'd be happy to offer Solaris build services, as well, should this become an
> issue - for as long as we can maintain our loyalty to Solaris. We are
> dependent now on the same set of variables to which Tom alludes. I think
> the inference must be: That a company wielding the resources of an Oracle
> could have long ago made a clear commitment to its de facto (if inherited)
> opensource community, if such a commitment had been its intention.
> We're now all in limbo on this...
> And don't forget the hard work of Steve Christensen; Steve continues to
> offer builds of PostgreSQL - and loads of other immensely useful packages -
> on SunFreeware, even in the face of tenuous support from Sun. Thank You,
> Steve!
Last company I worked at we used Oracle and the instant client had an
RPM version for RHEL4. It was something like 3 versions behind.
Oracle's answer to my queries to have a new version made? "Why don't
you make it?"
Wow, that's some support there... I have no great hopes for Sun under
Oracle management.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-08-01 20:10:49 | Re: PostgreSQL on Solaris future |
Previous Message | Lou Picciano | 2010-08-01 14:12:35 | Re: PostgreSQL on Solaris future |