Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?

From: Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Date: 2010-12-07 13:35:52
Message-ID: AANLkTikef-vMT=gj2FdhWdt8iM43Nbi4d33XyxtLDVH7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> [ shrug... ] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I guess.  To me the
> search_path change seems like the natural way to do that, and flipping a
> mess of synonyms the hack.  What happens when you miss one synonym?
>

That's exactly what I thought when I read it, too.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reuven M. Lerner 2010-12-07 13:51:24 Hanging with pg_restore and large objects
Previous Message Vick Khera 2010-12-07 13:31:13 Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?