From: | Martin Atukunda <matlads(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: URL alias for License |
Date: | 2010-12-11 17:17:39 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikdo_M=6wR26v_LiM2txvg=TkNDyGsB34ZJ6iZ+@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 14:21, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Dave Page's message of mar dic 07 03:43:36 -0300 2010:
>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> > Given that it's so much work to have a redirect, the solution is simple:
>>> > just change the page from licence to license. Surely no Brit is even
>>> > going to notice.
>>>
>>> I didn't say it was "so much work" (actually, I suggested it was
>>> probably the opposite) - I was arguing that we shouldn't create a
>>> system of redirects to maintain ad-infinitum for zero practical gain.
>>
>> I agree with that general policy, and I furthermore consider this one to
>> be a pretty reasonable exception.
>>
>> I, too, have written the URL by hand only to get a 404.
>
> I've applied a patch that redirects this in the proper place - the one
> Stefan did only redirected it on wwwmaster, which is not where the end
> user will see it...
>
Interestingly the text on the page uses the "License" form
:)
- Martin -
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-12-13 12:35:17 | Re: Documentation for "PostgreSQL 9"? |
Previous Message | Martin Atukunda | 2010-12-11 17:15:17 | Re: Documentation for "PostgreSQL 9"? |