Re: postgres data permission

From: Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Bear <David(dot)Bear(at)asu(dot)edu>
Cc: Silvio Brandani <silvio(dot)brandani(at)tech(dot)sdb(dot)it>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgres data permission
Date: 2010-07-16 07:14:45
Message-ID: AANLkTikaEBPs2BF30acRW-zkKM1TcqLs2zJlBQr44IsP@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

2010/7/15 David Bear <David(dot)Bear(at)asu(dot)edu>:
> this doesn't make sense. why go through the overhead of smb to get to a
> database cluster over a network connection when pg can already work over
> tcpip sockets and work much more switfly on a local file system?
>

Lets say you have to boxes:
#1: lots of disk but not much ram or cpu.
#2: lots of ram and cpu but not much disk.

Could it make sense to have box #2 run pg while mounting the fs of box #1?

--
Rob Wultsch
wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Montgomery 2010-07-16 07:30:40 Re: postgres data permission
Previous Message suhailck 2010-07-16 05:03:20 conditional backup