Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Shoaib Mir <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
Date: 2010-06-22 05:08:48
Message-ID: AANLkTikZgbXNbzhCkYonl8-_zIrR5Wq3eRc5KXIHRuXJ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
> 22.Haz.2010 tarihinde 06:43 saatinde, Shoaib Mir <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com>
> şunları yazdı:
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Carlo Stonebanks
> <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca> wrote:
>>
>> Is there any technical obstacle to anyone creating PL/PHP? I am cruious as
>> to why it doesn't alreay exist. I mean, I love my Tcl support, and I know
>> this is part of PG's legacy... but Tcl and no PHP? I figure there's a tech
>> reason for this - the demand must be there! No?
>>
>
> There is one already: https://public.commandprompt.com/projects/plphp
>
> IIRC, it does not compile against newer PostgreSQL releases and it is not
> under development right now.

I recall talking to the guys at command prompt and apparently
something in the php runtime makes it unsuitable for pl deployment.
Been a while, I don't remember what, just that the php folks had no
interest in fixing it.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2010-06-22 05:24:47 Re: High Availability with Postgres
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-22 04:26:05 Re: Problem Using RowType Declaration with Table Domains