| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, "jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SHOW TABLES |
| Date: | 2010-08-09 22:16:06 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikWr+sR03TPQj5NcYwpbRSMHU+vJm9m7edcsQ45@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply. If we are going to end up recreating SQL, we
> might as well just keep the backslash mess we have, or tell them to use
> SQL for the complex queries. My point was that we might find that what
> we cook up is as complex as what we have now.
I think that would require malice aforethought.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-08-09 22:33:50 | new client release |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-08-09 22:08:46 | Re: SHOW TABLES |