Re: back branches vs. VS 2008

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: back branches vs. VS 2008
Date: 2011-01-04 03:26:01
Message-ID: AANLkTikTEaLeuHLgRSenzid_=kSRyWMS32RV5aAOGR=X@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>>> And we're not going to be changing the version that's actually used
>>>> for the official binary builds, so all you'll accomplish then is to
>>>> have the buildfarm test something different form what we're shipping.
>
>>> Are you speaking for EDB on that?
>
>> He's not speaking *for* us, but he's absolutely right.
>
> OK, so what about the next question: is EDB running buildfarm members
> that will test the VS version(s) you are using?  I don't think Andrew
> is under any obligation to do that for you.

Yes, except for VC++ 2008/Win7 which we use for 9.0. That one remains
on my todo list.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-01-04 03:49:01 Re: back branches vs. VS 2008
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-01-04 03:25:22 Re: [PATCH] V3: Idle in transaction cancellation