| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Document the dummy_seclabel contrib module. |
| Date: | 2010-11-18 15:29:34 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikS=2zShDDWcsQ95pE_+T-_hFK-cJsyypyx+ON_@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> Minor correction:
>
> + The <filename>dummy_seclabel</> provides only four hardcoded
> + labels: <literal>unclassified</>, <literal>classified</>,
> + <literal>secret</>, <literal>top secret</> and <literal>trusted</>.
>
> Shouldn't this be "...dummy_seclabel</> module provides..."? And
> there are five hardcoded labels.
Good proofreading, as always, Thom. Actually, I think the word "four"
is correct, but "trusted" shouldn't be present in the list. I believe
that has to do with a part of the patch I didn't commit, and I failed
to clean it up properly.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-18 15:30:43 | pgsql: Minor corrections to dummy_seclabel documentation. |
| Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-11-18 09:24:15 | Re: pgsql: Document the dummy_seclabel contrib module. |