Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search

From: Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it>
To: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search
Date: 2010-07-28 07:22:16
Message-ID: AANLkTikRh59q5hBYNB8q4Qe7sbC33NVhuygbSnhgAGmO@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2010/7/28 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> Why is it that managers always see short term savings but fail to see
> longterm expenses?

It's all about CAPEX vs OPEX, baby!
Besides jokes, it's actually myopia.
Because they ALREADY spent money for training they don't see the need
for extra training (and costs), as if people would remain there forever and
knowledge is a definitive thing!

THe point would be to put costs in a time perspective, that is, how
much would it cost in,
say, 5 years, with PG and the same for Oracle.

--
Vincenzo Romano
NotOrAnd Information Technologies
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Massa, Harald Armin 2010-07-28 08:19:10 Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2010-07-28 06:25:20 Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search