Re: unlogged tables

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On lör, 2010-11-13 at 19:16 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> 1. The first one (relpersistence-v1) is a mostly mechanical patch that
>> replaces pg_class.relistemp (a Boolean) with pg_class.relpersistence
>> (a character), so that we can support more than two values.  BE SURE
>> YOU INITDB, since the old catalog format will not work with this patch
>> applied.
>
> Btw., I would recommend that even in-progress or proposed patches
> include catversion updates, which helps communicate the message such as
> yours in a more robust manner and also reduces the chance of forgetting
> the catversion change in the final commit.

I thought we had a policy of NOT doing that, because of the merge
conflicts thereby created. It's also hard to know what value to set
it to; whatever you pick will certainly be obsolete by commit time.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company