Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting

On 1 September 2010 09:36, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 31 August 2010 21:59, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
>> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>>>> I found some sample code the is supposed to work in all browers.
>>>> I tested it in Firefox and it worked.  It should work in Opera
>>>> and IE as well.  HTML/Javascript file attached.
>>>
>>> Thanks Bruce.  I've implemented your recommended change. :)
>>
>> Looks good to me in both Firefox and Konqueror.
>
> I've just tested it at work in IE6/7/8 and looks fine (sans shadows
> and rounded corners of course).  So I think that's no longer a
> problem.
>
> There are some changes that should be made to the docs to accommodate
> style changes though.  A good example can be seen on
> http://pgweb.darkixion.com:8081/docs/8.4/static/xml2.html . The
> functions and parameter tables don't have a header, and the functions
> listed in the functions table are each written as a synopsis rather
> than a function.
>
> Also take a look at
> http://pgweb.darkixion.com:8081/docs/8.4/static/functions-aggregate.html
> . Table 9-43 lists functions but the formatting changes for the last 3
> functions because the parameters weren't in the <function> element in
> the SGML.  This happens inconsistently throughout the documentation.
>
> I previously submitted a patch to fix all of these problems, although
> that appears to have not come through from looking at the mailing list
> archive (is there an attachment size limit?).  I've looked at a very
> large amount of the documentation with these styles, but not all of
> it, so there may be more issues I haven't yet witnessed.

I should also point out that someone I showed this to said that the
blue text I've used for function names throughout could make the text
be mistaken for a link. Comments?

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935