Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question?

From: Samuel Gendler <sgendler(at)ideasculptor(dot)com>
To: Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question?
Date: 2010-11-05 19:23:59
Message-ID: AANLkTikL2=SydpMrUbDD6zLQ6DDTdqeCOWZzff7bbWNv@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> 04.11.10 16:31, Nick Matheson написав(ла):
>
> Heikki-
>>
>>>
>>> Try COPY, ie. "COPY bulk_performance.counts TO STDOUT BINARY".
>>>
>>> Thanks for the suggestion. A preliminary test shows an improvement
>> closer to our expected 35 MB/s.
>>
>> Are you familiar with any Java libraries for decoding the COPY format? The
>> spec is clear and we could clearly write our own, but figured I would ask.
>> ;)
>>
> JDBC driver has some COPY support, but I don't remember details. You'd
> better ask in JDBC list.
>
>
>
The JDBC driver support works fine. You can pass a Reader or InputStream
(if I recall correctly, the InputStream path is more efficient. Or maybe
the Reader path was buggy. Regardless, I wound up using an InputStream in
the driver which I then wrap in a Reader in order to get it line-by-line.

You can write a COPY statement to send standard CSV format - take a look at
the postgres docs for the COPY statement to see the full syntax. I then
have a subclass of BufferedReader which parses each line of CSV and does
something interesting with it. I've had it working very reliably for many
months now, processing about 500 million rows per day (I'm actually COPYing
out, rather than in, but the concept is the same, rgardless - my
outputstream is wrapper in a writer, which reformats data on the fly).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Samuel Gendler 2010-11-05 19:29:48 Re: Simple (hopefully) throughput question?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-05 19:17:24 Re: [PERFORM] typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump