| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: system views for walsender activity |
| Date: | 2011-01-04 18:46:22 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikDhKsA83Msyaua4dDDjXU4HVV7=pFEQQKkUs_r@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The sent pointer is needed whether or not we have sync rep. We should
> also include application name, since the user may set that in the
> standby for all the same reasons it is set elsewhere.
>
> Small point: please lets not call this pg_stat_walsender?
> pg_stat_replication_sent and pg_stat_replication_received would be
> easier for normal humans to understand.
Eh... I may be showing my status as a non-normal human, but I know
exactly what pg_stat_walsender is (it's the view that shows you the
status of the WAL senders you've allowed by configuring
max_wal_senders>0) but I have no idea what pg_stat_replication_sent
and pg_stat_replication_received are supposed to be. Why two views?
*scratches head in confusion*
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-01-04 18:50:12 | Re: system views for walsender activity |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2011-01-04 18:40:25 | Re: Sync Rep Design |