| From: | Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pitr question |
| Date: | 2010-10-13 15:36:34 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTik2YMgec60bXJ5iB4GBQYeKv=HCGHXWisSnGfd9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey Myers
<lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com> wrote:
> 'In any case the hardware architecture must be the same — shipping from,
> say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work.'
>
> Is this specific to the hardware? That is to say, can I use pitr wal
> shipping from 64 bit hardware to 64 bit hardware, where one machine is
> running a 32 bit OS and the other is running a 64 bit OS?
>
It applies to the OS. The OS determines the sizes of integers,
padding alignment, etc. Running 32-bit OS on an amd64 class processor
is the same as running it on a x86 class processor. Other processors
(such as PowerPC) may behave differently, I don't know.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Geoffrey Myers | 2010-10-13 15:40:27 | Re: pitr question |
| Previous Message | Vick Khera | 2010-10-13 15:23:49 | Re: are there any method that "Update" command not affect other unrelated indices? |