Re: new compiler warnings

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: new compiler warnings
Date: 2011-01-26 22:40:28
Message-ID: AANLkTik2Xt6zNdV715rrG_=cNY_QH4V7K9u1WPu1Dq0k@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On ons, 2011-01-26 at 17:00 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> More to the point, regardless of whether the warning is reasonable or
>> not, there's tangible value in a warning-free build, which we have had
>> on most of the systems I use until recently.
>
> I don't disagree that the warnings are valid.  I'd just like to see them
> as well.
>
> It turns out you need -Wformat-security with newer GCC versions.  We
> might want to add that to the standard options set.
>
> Anyway: Fixed.

Thanks!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-01-26 22:41:39 Re: .gitignore patch for coverage builds
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-26 22:39:47 Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers