Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, david(at)lang(dot)hm, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql(at)jamponi(dot)net>, Mladen Gogala <mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2011-02-04 18:48:32
Message-ID: AANLkTik1OYXBvXryop=SiRg_54_7vwmAZMaYTK9Jt7_L@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Actually for me the main "con" with streaming analyze is that it adds
> significant CPU burden to already not too fast load process.

Exactly.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hitoshi Harada 2011-02-04 18:54:42 Re: Add ENCODING option to COPY
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-04 18:45:51 Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-04 18:49:44 Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives?
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-02-04 18:38:05 Re: Really really slow select count(*)