Re: BUG #5699: Postgres runs only under default user.

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Johannes Meidert <johannes(dot)meidert(at)rohde-schwarz(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5699: Postgres runs only under default user.
Date: 2010-10-11 07:47:58
Message-ID: AANLkTik0KcfxpSs=1XSbOFwpXcMupw249ZoL3NhH_KBO@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Craig Ringer
<craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 07:53 PM, Johannes Meidert wrote:
>>
>> The following bug has been logged online:
>>
>> Bug reference:      5699
>> Logged by:          Johannes Meidert
>> Email address:      johannes(dot)meidert(at)rohde-schwarz(dot)com
>> PostgreSQL version: 9.0.1
>> Operating system:   windows
>> Description:        Postgres runs only under default user.
>> Details:
>>
>> If a --superaccount is specified during installation other than
>> 'postgres',
>> the service will not start correctly and there are lots of errors "role
>> <postgres>  does not exist" in the DB error log.
>> The option -- superaccount should be removed.
>
> It does seem a bit odd - if the super account is wired into the database
> cluster at initdb time, you'd think it'd be read from there on startup.
>
> Comments, anybody? This report hasn't seen a response, but seems to have
> some legitimacy as a usability issue if not an outright bug.

I saw an email from our QA team a few minutes ago saying they have
been unable to reproduce the problem. What command line/options file
did you use exactly Johannes?

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Netskin | Corin Langosch 2010-10-11 09:05:55 Re: BUG #5702: pg fails to use a conditional index even the where clause matches the condition
Previous Message Johannes.Meidert 2010-10-11 07:35:05 Re: BUG #5698: pg_dump (8.3.11) does not consider constrains