Re: WIP: Range Types

From: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Range Types
Date: 2011-01-06 00:30:25
Message-ID: AANLkTik0CvhTYTSC+aF-LqZgCfcLwM36FTLin-+KaK8y@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/1/6 Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>:
> Even if add and subtract were associated with a range type, there's no
> way to tell which range type to pick given the window function syntax
> (multiple range types could be defined over the same subtype).
>
> I think the interface question should be addressed more directly with a
> "type interfaces" patch.

I agree the current canonical approach fits range type's demand, and
I'm inclined that the type interface discussion is another point.
IIRC, Robert Haas originally began to propose the idea of type
interface to get together three of KNN-GIST, range type and window
frame issue. For KNN-GIST, it was committed by extending pg_amop
without considering others and range type will be as well. Not getting
them together might be the answer.

Regards,

--
Hitoshi Harada

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-01-06 01:57:58 Re: making an unlogged table logged
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-01-05 23:25:37 Re: "writable CTEs"