Re: Hardware recommendations

From: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>
To: Andy <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, Benjamin Krajmalnik <kraj(at)servoyant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Hardware recommendations
Date: 2010-12-09 00:02:54
Message-ID: AANLkTik-0yPduub2V=eEh3mQGWyFjhJQcHz4DtCnSQnG@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 01:26, Andy <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> If you are IO-bound, you might want to consider using SSD.
>
> A single SSD could easily give you more IOPS than 16 15k SAS in RAID 10.

Are there any that don't risk your data on power loss, AND are cheaper
than SAS RAID 10?

Regards,
Marti

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Benjamin Krajmalnik 2010-12-09 00:03:31 Re: Hardware recommendations
Previous Message Pierre C 2010-12-08 23:35:34 Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows