Re: git: uh-oh

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Max Bowsher <maxb(at)f2s(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Date: 2010-08-25 18:39:13
Message-ID: AANLkTi=oQbvAkSQesebVfCgGOR9C16+DdKQejz=8NiG0@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> The fact that the file was "modified" twice after being removed at rev
>> 2.88 seems really wacko.  Are you sure that's not contributing to what
>> we're seeing here?
>
> Yeah, that was discussed in the earlier git-conversion thread that I
> pointed to.  We never did figure out how that happened, though I
> speculated it might have been due to weirdness in Vadim's local
> checkout.
>
> Is it possible to just delete those two revisions from the CVS
> repository, and if so would it help?  We certainly don't need 'em.

cvs admin -o ?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A.M. 2010-08-25 19:18:03 new notify payload as string
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-08-25 18:30:38 Re: Performance Farm Release