Re: getting set up on git (finally)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: getting set up on git (finally)
Date: 2010-10-09 03:12:42
Message-ID: AANLkTi=zvX=CZXJ4Xmrz+EACTvQxtELCM4r702E3Sfx_@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm finally trying to get current with the switch to git, following this
> wiki page:
>
>  http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Committing_with_Git
>
> Specifically, I am trying to do:
> ------------
> Dependent Clone per Branch, Pushing and Pulling From a Local Repository
>  -plus-
> Clone Locally, Repoint Origin
> ------------
>
> In order to set this up, I used the attached recipe. Does that look
> reasonable and correct?
>
> I am hoping that from this point forward I can treat each of those
> checked out branches exactly (more-or-less) as I did under cvs -- true? E.g.
>
>  #make some changes
>  git commit -a
>  git push

Looks fairly sane on a quick once-over.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-09 03:16:41 Re: Total memory allocated to postgres
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-09 03:08:05 Re: Keywords in pg_hba.conf should be field-specific