scheduling

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: scheduling
Date: 2010-08-08 02:13:36
Message-ID: AANLkTi=iB3HOq9-o7foh=LUZibtSEPezzDYw4-Kcr2Cs@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Do we have a projected data for the next 9.0 wrap, and will it be
beta5 or rc1? How much should we worry about the remaining open
items?

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items

I am inclined to say that all three of the items currently on the list
need to be addressed in some way before we move forward... or at least
the last two.

* ExplainOnePlan handles snapshots differently than ProcessQuery
* Backup procedure is wrong?
* Walreceiver crashes in AIX

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-08-08 02:41:27 Re: scheduling
Previous Message Gordon Shannon 2010-08-07 23:11:21 Re: Surprising dead_tuple_count from pgstattuple