From: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: disable trigger all |
Date: | 2010-09-29 15:43:04 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=d1694b8T2j+yYCmgqHegm2N-9inXq2RY_=oug@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2010/9/29 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> =?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?= <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I got bitten Today by 'alter table disable trigger all' vs 'trigger user'.
>> Basically , assuming that psql doesn't show me that FKs are disabled
>> some code was using 'trigger all' instead of 'user'.
>
> I think that is today's lesson in why not to work as a superuser except
> when you absolutely have to.
Thanks :)
Somehow I knew, you're not going to say. 'Ya, this is a bug, that info
should be displayed to the user'.
--
GJ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Henri De Feraudy | 2010-09-29 16:31:57 | Basic question on PGSQL and Transactions |
Previous Message | Adam Wizon | 2010-09-29 15:14:54 | Fwd: Restore problem from 8.4 backup to 9.0 |