Re: BUG #5605: round(attr_name,int) works bad

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Adam Radlowski <adamr(at)informatyka(dot)gdansk(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5605: round(attr_name,int) works bad
Date: 2010-08-06 17:22:19
Message-ID: AANLkTi=UtAQQxBzh69DaAtQ14qBtRjmCXGbVacinSeW2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 02:12, Adam Radlowski
<adamr(at)informatyka(dot)gdansk(dot)pl> wrote:
> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4
> Operating system:   Gentoo 64 bit (PSQL 8.4.4), Fedora 12 32 bit (PSQL
> 8.4.1)

> select round(any_numeric_field*something,2) from any_table;
> I get information, that the function dos not exist.

Can we get the exact *input* and the error? I cant replicate it here:
select round(100::numeric*100, 2);

> If I use round(numeric_field*something,int) in "insert" command, round
> returns always only the value of "numeric_field".

So... insert into table (field) values (round(100*2, 1)) inserts 100?
I find that quite hard to believe. Again some actually sql might help
here as I might just be misunderstanding.

> Comment:
> In some cases I can use for example:
> select round(100.0*any_numeric_field)/100.0 from any_table;
> ..but in programs wchich are generating SQL code and I can't modify them it
> is important problem.

Sounds like a problem with whatever is generating the SQL not a
problem with postgres.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2010-08-06 17:22:38 Re: BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-08-06 15:37:34 Re: BUG #5607: memmory leak in ecpg