| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Otto <asche(at)me(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: ISN patch that applies cleanly with git apply |
| Date: | 2010-10-20 13:01:35 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=RpSS7J47dNyb0ZYkG7eo-CtGnxAiUDedQ=JY-@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Peter Geoghegan
<peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I have committed the patch and the text proposed above.
>
> Can I take it that there is no need for a formal review, where I
> answer various questions per
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch?
That is correct. That page is just a list of things to think about,
anyway; a review needn't be in exactly that format (in fact I'm not
sure it was even intended to be used that way).
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-20 13:02:36 | Re: Extensions, this time with a patch |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-10-20 12:50:53 | Re: Simplifying replication |