| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Step ordering pgAgent |
| Date: | 2011-01-03 18:41:42 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=PZ6J1CEJrkmO4eBrgaYyBFk7pf6o8XMX7YJBA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 19:08, Jasmin Dizdarevic
<jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Why is the trigger consistency so important for you? In my opinion triggers
> have nothing to do with job steps. Other agent implementations (e.g.
> sqlagent) also provides the ability to reorder steps.
> Magnus, you're right there is no bug report on it. Could a reason for that
> be that pgAgent isn't used on much installations?
Yes, that would be my guess. I haven't come across many installations
in the wild myself.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-01-03 19:52:40 | Re: Step ordering pgAgent |
| Previous Message | Jasmin Dizdarevic | 2011-01-03 18:08:24 | Re: Step ordering pgAgent |