| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | rod(at)iol(dot)ie |
| Cc: | Marie-Claude QUIDOZ <Marie-Claude(dot)QUIDOZ(at)cefe(dot)cnrs(dot)fr>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: problem with access database |
| Date: | 2010-10-04 17:49:55 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=EZA+n28-h_cPKFqpd0w45mShXOBxXYJkVZW4G@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-support |
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> wrote:
> I presume that "edb" is the equivalent in EnterpriseDB - the EDB folks here
> will be able to confirm.
It is.
> "template1" is what was used in older versions of PostgreSQL. However,
> template1 is also used as a default template when new databases are created,
> so having a separate "postgres" database keeps things tidy.
Thats correct.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ernst W. Winter | 2010-10-05 07:02:26 | update with FreeBSD PostgreSQL 9.0 and pgadmin3 |
| Previous Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2010-10-04 16:45:16 | Re: problem with access database |