Re: Really really slow select count(*)

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, sthomas(at)peak6(dot)com, Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com>, felix <crucialfelix(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Really really slow select count(*)
Date: 2011-02-08 22:14:46
Message-ID: AANLkTi=BOpBe_23dqTqq7rKiP7H-0cGtVx-4+8n8LbJ5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>
>> Are there any settings in postgresql.conf that would make it unsafe to
>> use -m immediate?
>>
>
> Two concerns:
>
> -Clients will be killed without any review, and data related to them lost
>
> -The server will have to go through recovery to start back up again, which
> could potentially take a long time.  If you manage a successful shutdown
> that doesn't happen.
>
> Shouldn't be unsafe, just has those issues.

Good, I was kinda worried about full_page_writes being off or fsync or
something like that being a problem.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Crooke 2011-02-08 23:14:20 Re: Bad query plan when the wrong data type is used
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-02-08 22:08:25 Re: Really really slow select count(*)