Re: plperlu problem with utf8

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: plperlu problem with utf8
Date: 2010-12-18 06:46:54
Message-ID: AANLkTi=AgYM4TFWNoW3FYmkEbVcqefm5EPEtN+_=8s1F@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 18:22, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2010, at 5:04 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>
>>> see? Either uri_unescape() should be decoding that utf8() or you need
>>> to do it *after* you call uri_unescape().  Hence the maybe it could be
>>> considered a bug in uri_unescape().
>>
>> Agreed.
>
> On second thought, no. You can in fact encode anything in a URI. URI::Escape can't know what to decode to. So *I believe* it just unescapes the raw bytes. It might be handy for it to have a new function, though, to complement its uri_escape_utf() function:
>
>    sub uri_unescape_utf8 { Encode::decode_utf8(uri_unescape(@_)) }
>
> Just to make things a bit clearer.
>
> But that's a separate issue from the, erm, inconsistency with which PL/Perl treats encoding and decoding of its inputs and outputs.

Yay! So I think we can finally agree that for Oleg's original test
case postgres was getting right. I hope ? :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-12-18 06:53:36 Re: plperlu problem with utf8
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-12-18 06:43:48 Re: plperlu problem with utf8