| From: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dimi Paun <dimi(at)lattica(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What is postmaster doing? |
| Date: | 2010-10-20 21:47:21 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=0r-8OgG5OQuBNF0UVDkDA6aqmJu6qOqS-Mw4k@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dimi Paun <dimi(at)lattica(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hm, what ps options did you use? I'm having a hard time reproducing
>>> your display format on Fedora 13 (procps-3.2.8-7.fc13.x86_64).
>
>> Sorry, it wasn't a ps output, it was a line from top(1).
>
> Oh, yeah, top typically doesn't give you the up-to-date process command
> line. Next time try ps, or pg_stat_activity.
Or use htop. it identifies all the basic postgresql processes by job,
like logger process, writer process and so on.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-10-20 21:51:14 | Re: What is postmaster doing? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-20 20:57:38 | Re: What is postmaster doing? |