| From: | David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: MySQL-ism help patch for psql |
| Date: | 2010-01-19 20:54:36 |
| Message-ID: | A4D662A0-F17C-4802-B9FC-7D7C1B948D71@endpoint.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> The previous discussion started from the idea that only DESCRIBE,
> SHOW DATABASES/TABLES, and USE were worth worrying about. If we
> were to agree that we'd go that far and no farther, the potential
> conflict with SQL syntax would be pretty limited. I have little
> enough experience with mysql to not want to opine too much on how
> useful that would be, but it does seem like those are commands
> I use right away anytime I am using mysql.
I have no problems paring down the list of cases; these were the
correspondences I saw off the top of my head. I definitely don't want
to conflict with any SQL syntax. The exact wording/output of the
messages can be adjusted at whim.
Regards,
David
--
David Christensen
End Point Corporation
david(at)endpoint(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Markus Wanner | 2010-01-19 20:55:23 | Re: Mammoth in Core? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-01-19 20:49:37 | Re: MySQL-ism help patch for psql |