Re: search_path vs extensions

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: search_path vs extensions
Date: 2009-05-28 21:23:17
Message-ID: A361A64F-38ED-47C4-A041-E6499715FC19@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 28, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> I suppose there might be some use-case involving concurrent
> installation
> of multiple versions of the *same* extension, but I'm not sure we
> should
> be designing around that as a key case.

Agreed. One thing at a time.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2009-05-28 21:24:37 Re: search_path vs extensions
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-05-28 21:21:58 Re: search_path vs extensions