Postgres optimizer

From: "Mouhamadou Dia" <MDia(at)accovia(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Postgres optimizer
Date: 2007-08-03 17:58:51
Message-ID: A0C6A99779467D40A9EABA100CAA1284040ACAA6@cpt107.magrit.int
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hello,

I have a Postgres instance (version 8.1) running on a Solaris 10
machine. When I run the following query

SELECT * FROM PROR_ORG, ( ( ( ( (PRPT_PRT LEFT OUTER JOIN PRPT_PRTADR
ON

PRPT_PRT.PRT_NRI = PRPT_PRTADR.PRT_NRI AND PRPT_PRTADR.ADR_F_DEF=true)

LEFT OUTER JOIN PLGE_CTY ON PRPT_PRTADR.CTY_NRI = PLGE_CTY.CTY_NRI)
LEFT

OUTER JOIN PLGE_CTY1 PLGE_CTY_PLGE_CTY1 ON PLGE_CTY.CTY_NRI =

PLGE_CTY_PLGE_CTY1.CTY_NRI AND PLGE_CTY_PLGE_CTY1.LNG_CD = 'fr') LEFT

OUTER JOIN PLGE_CTRSD ON PRPT_PRTADR.CTRSD_CD = PLGE_CTRSD.CTRSD_CD

AND PRPT_PRTADR.CTR_ISO_CD = PLGE_CTRSD.CTR_ISO_CD) LEFT OUTER JOIN

PLGE_CTR ON PRPT_PRTADR.CTR_ISO_CD = PLGE_CTR.CTR_ISO_CD) , PROR_ORG1

PROR_ORG_PROR_ORG1, PROR_ORGT, PROR_ORGT1 PROR_ORGT_PROR_ORGT1

WHERE ( (PROR_ORG.ORGT_CD = PROR_ORGT.ORGT_CD) AND

(PROR_ORGT.ORGT_CD = PROR_ORGT_PROR_ORGT1.ORGT_CD AND

PROR_ORGT_PROR_ORGT1.LNG_CD = 'fr') AND (PROR_ORG.PRT_NRI =

PROR_ORG_PROR_ORG1.PRT_NRI AND PROR_ORG_PROR_ORG1.LNG_CD = 'fr') AND

(PROR_ORG.PRT_NRI = PRPT_PRT.PRT_NRI) ) AND ( ((PROR_ORG.ORGT_CD
='CHAIN')) )

it takes 45 seconds to run. In this case the optimizer does a sequential
scan of the PRPT_PRT table (which is the largest one) despite the
existence of an index on PRT_NRI column of PRPT_PRT table.

I've activated the GEQO but it still takes nearly the same time to run
(between 40 and 45s).

When I change the order of PRPT_PRT and PROR_ORG tables, it takes only
30 milliseconds to run. In this case the optimizer uses the index on
PRT_NRI column of PRPT_PRT table, what is normal and what I was
expecting.

Is there a known problem with the Postgres optimizer?

For your information, the same query takes 20 milliseconds to run on
Informix and 60 milliseconds to run on Oracle independently of the order
of the tables in the query.

PRPT_PRT has 1.3 millions rows

PRPT_PRTADR has 300.000 rows

PROR_ORG has 1500 rows

These are the largest tables, all the others are small tables. All
statistics are up to date.

Thanks

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Lewis 2007-08-03 18:28:33 Re: Postgres optimizer
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2007-08-03 17:56:23 Re: Performance problems with large telemetric datasets on 7.4.2