From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Magnus Hagander' <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: running as a service? |
Date: | 2004-05-17 01:09:46 |
Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F45C@harris.memetrics.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> As for which - the current code (submitted by Claudio) does an "extra
> fork/exec" on the postmaster, basically making the postmaster
> a wrapper for itself (correct me if I remember incorrectly here Claudio -
seems
> the archives.postgresql.org server is down ATM, and I can't find the
> patch locally).
Yes and no. That's how I have it on my box, but iirc the code I submitted
was just the service calls without the postmaster/main.c integration. Should
be a no brainer to hook it to a dozen line main.c stand-alone wrapper.
> If so, I think it would actualliy be slightly cleaner to
> have it in a separate binary (that still does all the signal
> translation we need, of course).
Agree.
> overall. But it *has* to go in the main distro.
Agree twice over.
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-05-17 02:31:50 | Re: Runtime Problems |
Previous Message | Richard Luckhurst | 2004-05-17 00:21:05 | Re: Runtime Problems |