From: | J Smith <dark_panda(at)hushmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sourceforge on Oracle? |
Date: | 2001-11-12 20:25:14 |
Message-ID: | 9spbc6$itk$1@news.tht.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Although my submission to /. on the subject was rejected, they posted
something similar today. Tim responded to one of my posts with the
following:
"I decided to let go of the wreckage called VA Linux about 2 1/2 months
ago, so I'm not involved.
The switch to closed-source and Oracle is a result of the... shall we
say... lack of success in the sales department while the open source code
was available."
FWIW.
J
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I just read that the new commercial version of Sourceforge will _only_
>> run on Linux/Oracle:
>> http://www.idg.net/ic_724290_1773_1-3921.html
>
> I suppose it'd be inappropriate to post this link on Slashdot under
> a heading like "SourceForge Sells Out: No more open-source database
> support" ...
>
> Tim Perdue read this list last I heard, wonder if he's going to weigh
> in on this thread?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | J Smith | 2001-11-12 20:41:48 | Re: Sourceforge on Oracle? |
Previous Message | Ilker Egilmez | 2001-11-12 19:59:32 | index on numbers not honoured |